Another Post on Automatic Getters and Setters

Recently I was looking at the Groovy section on DZone, and there was an article called Evil: Getters and Setters Where They’re Not Required (original here). He reiterates a lot of what I have been saying in my posts about why I am making the Groovy Validators.

I doubt that he and I are the only two that have noticed this issue. I have heard/read a lot of people complain about the verbosity of getters and setters (like we can get in Eclipse), and how much cleaner it is to use a language that will generate them for you (like Groovy and Ruby). Yet it is odd that so many times people gloss over the fact that these blind, automatic getters and setters essentially leave your variables wide open for just about anything. It seems like people hate verbosity more than they like data integrity.

Granted, I am a bit out of practice with Ruby, so it is possible that there is some sort of validation in the non-Rails Ruby space. And this is purely anecdotal. I just thought it was interesting.

UPDATE: I am making some progress on using the validation annotations with immutable objects. Hopefully Mr LaForge hasn’t closed that bug yet, and announcing my validators will bring me fame and fortune.